Original Post: Understanding the Nuances: DAST vs. Penetration Testing
The content discusses the importance of understanding and utilizing various tools and techniques to secure applications against cyberattacks, focusing on Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and Penetration Testing. Insights from Florian Walter, a certified ethical hacker, reveal that:
-
DAST is an automated method that identifies security vulnerabilities in web applications and APIs during runtime, making it suitable for continuous security checks throughout the software development lifecycle.
- Penetration Testing is a manual method performed by expert testers to find vulnerabilities that automated tools might miss, providing deep, actionable insights, especially in complex environments with sensitive data.
Florian Walter highlights that DAST is effective for frequent checks during development and maintenance stages, while Penetration Testing is essential for in-depth security evaluations before major releases or for applications handling sensitive data. Both methods complement each other to provide a comprehensive security strategy, balancing quick automated checks with detailed human analysis to uncover complex issues.
The content concludes that Veracode offers integrated security solutions combining both methods, enabling organizations to address both broad and deep aspects of application security. Veracode ensures compliance with stringent regulations and provides flexible subscription models for recurring Penetration Testing. Organizations are encouraged to chat with AppSec experts or try Veracode DAST for more secure applications.
Go here to read the Original Post